India telecom Growth Story

July 22, 2008 - Leave a Response

India represents a land of opportunity for operators. However, the challenges of such a vast and varied market are daunting.

India is growing at a staggering rate. It is the second most populous country in the world and is expected – if current growth trends continue – to overtake China before the middle of this century. And it is a youthful country; of the estimated 1.14 billion people living in India at present, some 40 per cent are under 15 years of age and 54 per cent are under 24. The median age is 25.

The economy is diverse, though characterised at the moment by a booming services sector, boosted in no small part by the ranks of firms from ‘developed’ markets taking advantage of the cost savings associated with outsourcing and off-shoring certain of their operations to the subcontinent.

The economic strength of India and Indians is undoubtedly on an upward curve, although ARPU is low by Western standards, ranging from $4.60-$8.90 per month according to Informa Telecoms & Media’s World Cellular Information Service. Falling ARPU figures in India, are compensated by surging growth though. Penetration has more than doubled since June 2006 and stood at 21.67 per cent in March this year. With 242 million mobile phone subscribers nationwide there is plenty more scope for growth.

A licence is required to operate in each of the 19 Telecom Circle Service and four Metro Service Areas, known collectively as “circles” in India. This has resulted in a fragmented cellular landscape with carriers offering a mix of GSM and CDMA services. There are currently 13 mobile operators of varying sizes in India. Eleven are shown in table 1, the 12th and 13th are CDMA carriers called Rainbow (Shyam Telelink) which has 57,600 subscribers in the Rajasthan circle and Connect (HFCL Infotel) which has 204,300 subscribers in the Punjab circle – both have plans to roll out nationwide GSM networks.

Informa Telecoms&Media’s World Cellular Information Service currently lists a further six planned or potential networks: Agrani Telecom; ByCell; Datacom; S Tel; Swan and Unitech. However, the new, smaller entrants are going to find it hard to compete with larger national players.

In order to avoid the existing players simply acquiring the new entrants, the Department of Telecommunications (DOT) has tightened the merger rules. “The DOT has brought in new M&A regulations, the most controversial of which lowers the market share of subscriptions and revenues that a merged entity can hold in a given circle, from 67 per cent to just 40 per cent,” says Tony Brown Informa Telecoms&Media editor AsiaCom. The DOT also announced that it will not allow new Unified Access Services Licence holders to merge with existing operators until they have been operating for three years.

Further complicating matters, the scenario for 3G licensing has yet to fully unfold. The issue of 3G has been on India’s drawing board since July 2004, and the debate continues concerning a licensing framework and the likely timing of licence awards. However, the 3G auction could take place by year-end, according to an Indian regulatory source.

“The 3G auction will be held in six months maximum,” a source from the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) told Informa Telecoms&Media late in April.

The DOT is believed to be planning to hold the first of two 3G spectrum auctions by year-end, with the second to be held in March. Reports say that, most likely, a maximum of three operators will be awarded spectrum in most circles, in the first round. Also, government-owned operators BSNL and MTNL will reportedly be awarded 3G spectrum without having to take part in the auction.

“The auction’s timing depends on whether the military returns the required 60MHz of spectrum at 2.1GHz to the DOT on time,” says Brown. “The military may release some spectrum earlier which would allow a ‘partial’ auction of whatever spectrum is available with a second auction to follow once the military returns the balance of the spectrum,” says Brown. “Though the military cannot return the 3G spectrum until the DOT finishes the fibre-optic network which the military will use instead.

“The DOT must also finalise its stance on whether foreign players can partake in an open 3G auction. In its draft 3G regulations, issued in March, the DOT ignored recommendations from the TRAI and proposed allowing domestic and foreign operators to bid for spectrum,” says Brown.

But the TRAI remains vehemently opposed to an open auction, saying that the involvement of international players would jeopardise investments made by existing mobile operators. “In our recommendations of 2006, TRAI said to the government to please ensure that existing licensees get 3G spectrum only,” the TRAI source said. “TRAI believes that eight, nine or even 10 operators per circle is enough competition.”

In May, the TRAI demanded that the Finance Ministry drop its calls for the auction to be opened up to international bidders. The ministry was hoping the inclusion of international bidders would increase spectrum revenues.

“The DOT and TRAI are at loggerheads over whether new operators (especially foreign operators) should be allowed to bid for 3G spectrum,” says Brown. “This is a crucial question but looks like being settled in favour of the DOT quite soon although it might require the intervention of the Prime Minister’s Office.”

Mirroring developments in other, much more saturated markets, voice revenues are falling fast, which has caused operators to start to push data services at a relatively early point in the penetration growth curve. While the scenario for 3G licensing remains undecided, mobile data is likely to continue to be driven by non-3G applications such as ringtones ringback tones and SMS.

The content market in India has vast potential. However, there are issues that look likely to stifle the development of the premium value added services (VAS) segment of the market.

Mobile operators stand accused of being high-handed and offering little by way of support to content providers. This, say the content providers, is stifling the growth of the industry. For their part, the mobile operators in India have stated that although they want to support the VAS segment, they have to be sure about the quality of the content, as well as the revenue-generating potential.

There is further disquiet in the market linked to the revenue that operators are willing to share with third party content providers. Which, for those in the West, will make familiar reading. Of the total VAS industry – including operator revenue – consumer revenue and including ringback tones VAS providers receive not more than 12.5 per cent according to Informa Telecoms&Media.

The usual mobile entertainment suspects – music, gaming and TV – are slowly building a presence in India. Indeed, Indian consumers purchased more mobile than physical music in the first three months of 2007 and will buy almost nine times more mobile music than any other format by 2009, according to the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry and Internet and Mobile Association of India.

With internet penetration low there is a good chance that for many Indians their first taste of life on the web will be via a mobile phone. In markets such as this, mobile social networking has proved popular. However, the costs to the majority of consumers are prohibitive and until 3G networks and handsets are fully rolled out, the user experience is likely to be uninspiring. But with plenty of headroom for growth, operators still have more than enough to play for in what, one day, could well be the largest mobile market on the planet.

Intelligence Centres are powerful information services designed to provide you with up-to-the minute market comment, intelligence, data and analyst access, via a single, convenient online platform.

TOTAL HISTORICAL SUBSCRIBERS IN INDIA
Operator Jun 06 Sep 06 Dec 06 Mar 07 Jun 07 Sep 07 Dec 07 Mar 08
Aircel 3,123,330 3,689,010 4,380,710 5,375,740 6,577,400 7,691,780 8,953,650 10,002,810
BPL Mobile 1,297,280 1,045,300 1,056,280 1,070,850 1,087,990 1,153,360 1,239,470 1,294,760
BSNL 18,293,710 20,936,320 23,618,550 27,428,780 28,423,290 30,303,230 32,701,240 36,209,960
Bharti 23,072,590 27,061,380 31,974,070 37,141,260 42,703,920 48,875,680 55,162,970 61,984,730
Dishnet Wireless 75,490 115,230 131,980 138,740 197,820 347,580 474,450 607,620
(owned by Aircel)
Hutchison 17,544,360 20,357,230 23,306,190 26,441,850 30,751,510
Idea 8,537,080 10,363,570 12,442,450 14,010,560 16,126,410 18,671,880 21,054,020 24,001,580
MTNL 2,169,660 2,290,260 2,424,530 2,746,820 2,608,810 2,772,120 2,954,880 3,241,850
Reliance 19,025,020 21,934,760 25,336,110 24,958,860 27,839,780 31,039,780 36,004,160 39,035,470
Communications
Spice Telecom 2,054,620 2,196,970 2,449,660 2,728,950 3,170,430 3,481,720 3,800,640 4,210,670
Tata Teleservices 6,620,120 8,435,420 10,248,910 11,432,930 12,747,160 14,200,000 15,989,960 17,421,400
Vodafone Essar 35,657,550 39,864,870 44,126,260
Total 101,813,260 118,425,450 137,369,440 153,475,340 172,234,520 194,194,680 218,200,310 242,137,110
Source: Informa Telecoms&Media’s World Cellular Information Service.
FORECAST SUBSCRIBER GROWTH BY 2013
Carrier GSM CDMA WCDMA
Aircel 27,304,000 4,590,900
Bharti Airtel 103,995,000 36,778,000
BPL Mobile 12,827,000 355,200
BSNL 50,150,000 444,600 14,593,000
Idea 55,774,000 7,520,700
HFCL Infotel 1,029,900
MTNL 3,422,000 688,200
Reliance Communications 35,639,000 37,729,000 17,878,000
Shyam Telelink 10,308,000 1,245,800
Spice Telecom 11,981,000 3,226,000
Tata Teleservices 12,626,000 20,052,000 8,628,000
Vodafone Essar 82,912,000 22,489,000
Source: Informa Telecoms&Media’s World Cellular Information Service

Website Statistic Publicly Available

July 16, 2008 - Leave a Response

Admitedly, this is an ambitious list, but it’s also a worthwhile one. Below, I’ve attempted to lay the foundation for every piece of website data available to marketers, researchers and the curious. Competitive analysis experts, welcome to data paradise:

Technical Data

Ownership/Hosting Data

Statistics/Popularity Data

Search Engine Indexing Data

Link Data

  • Yahoo! Link Data – via Yahoo! Site Explorer
  • Technorati Link Data – via Technorati
  • MSN Link Data – via Live.com
  • Google Link Data – via Google (note that this information is purposefully inaccurate)
  • Google PageRank – via RankAlert (shows for all 72 datacenters)
  • Exalead Links – via Exalead

Social Tagging Data

Third-Party Trust Metrics

Important Directory & Site Listings

Press & Media Mentions

Top 3 value propositions for winning an RFP response

June 19, 2008 - One Response

Crafting a winning request for proposal (RFP) response is critical in the highly competitive service provider market, as traditional services are common, offered by multiple carriers and are most often commodity purchases that were historically compared on price. This is especially true in the service provider space as it relates to data and voice transport, hosted services and product resell.

The secret to winning a customer’s business usually comes down to the “extras” that your organization can bring to the table as a trusted partner and one-stop shop. These extras are the differentiators between your commodity-priced services and those of your competitors, in that there is a value proposition that can be made even if the customer has requested commodity type services.

I have personally seen differentiate the decision process outside of the cost factors. If you are consistently getting beat on a cost basis for the RFPs you are responding to, and your organization has driven the cost as low as possible, you really only have two choices. You can reduce costs to a level that can severely impact your business model, or offer additional value propositions that will encourage the customer to look at your services as more than a commodity-based service compared on cost alone.

Winning business beyond commodity pricing

I have worked as a consultant in the service provider and enterprise space for 15 years and below are three areas that definitely make a difference:

1. Highlight the infrastructure backbone availability/survivability and scalability used to transport the services you offer.
2. Highlight service level agreement (SLA) offerings (even if not asked) and emphasize your ability to provide uninterrupted service.
3. Bundle in architecture/design and integration expertise.

Each of these provides the customer with insight into how you as a provider are much more than just a commodity-based store that competes on price. Each of these is discussed below in further detail.

# Highlight survivability. This is key in that you want the customer to know that you have engineered the best backbone infrastructure and that you can guarantee your network can scale to meet both current and future bandwidth needs. This approach highlights the fact that you have invested the time and capital into building a world-class network that can handle all of your customers needs. This can soften the blow of percentage points higher in transport costs because it provides the customer peace of mind. If you don’t highlight and emphasize this in the response, the customer will lean toward the lowest-cost provider, regardless of whether or not they can actually deliver around failure and growth.

# Highlight SLAs. If you don’t have them, you need them. If potential customers don’t ask for them in the RFP, tell them anyway. Most RFPs are tactical in nature and don’t necessarily consider a three-to-five year window of requirements. Expanding the response in anticipation of the customer requiring SLAs in the future shows that you are a strategic partner, not just a supplier competing on cost.

# Bundle in expertise. Whether this expertise is on front-end planning and design work or on back-end integration, most customers do not have the in-house expertise or resource pool to handle migrations to technologies requested in RFPs. The ability to provide this expertise and the ability for a customer to get these resources from one place is a strategic value proposition. It also means the customer will have fewer vendor contracts to manage. Touting your expertise as a mechanism for reducing deployment costs and minimizing migration risks can be a very powerful incentive for the customer.

These three areas represent value propositions that can differentiate one provider from another in the commodity service space. If you don’t have the ability to respond in this fashion, you could still win on cost. But more and more, enterprises are looking for their carriers to bring more to the table and aligning your responses to these facts can help you win more than your fair share.

What Is SOA?

February 15, 2008 - Leave a Response

On a less serious note.Greg the Architect is pretty funny.

Doing Buiness with Second life?

January 5, 2008 - Leave a Response

Apple Store in Second Life

Second Life (SL) is not terribly user friendly, even to the avid gamer. It requires huge amounts of bandwidth to even be remotely functional and latency for countries outside of the US is a major issue. Taking Business sense out of SL I suggest we should study the viability more from individual business perspective.

1. For B2C businesses whose product’s assets are to a large extend “intangible” (e.g. fashionware, interior design, architecture…) SL might be a nice playground, to test products that might ultimately generate cash flow in real life.
2. For B2B, I believe only SL’s distance learning and e-conferencing facilities might become interesting in the long run. In the long run, because today, you’re gonna have a tough time convincing a senior manager to play with a digital doll. We will need to wait until virtually reality is mature to go there.
3. Full-SL businesses that sell services to 1 and 2 will probably be the only ones making some money in SL right now.

Finally the successful ventures, in my opinion, are taking the approach to not replicate real life business transactions but instead trying to do things in SL that they cannot do in Real Life.

Rahul

SL-ID Blazingleo agrawal

Startup’s Guide to Web 2.0.

January 4, 2008 - Leave a Response

How do you survive in startup business where chances are 9/10 wont be in business in next year! Well lot of startup are turning to web to define their business model and to reach their customer . The challenge which any startup is puzzled on how to use the best of web for his business. The web 2.0 is something which comes to mind for any knowledge and services based business, But the complexities thrown around have kept the startups on the banks of virtual world.

Lets take a digg at what web 2.0 means for startup?

You’ll find a lot of definitions of Web 2.0, so brace yourself for a little confusion as you sort through this. But in my opinion, Web 2.0 is about embracing the Net’s abilily to connect people to provide services that both contribute to, and benefit from, communities of users. And the larger and more participative the community, the stronger the service (consultants and MBAs would call this a “network effect”). News on Yahoo! is very 1 dimensional (you read what their editors have posted), and therefore, Web 1.0. Digg.com, on the other hand, is based on news submitted by its users. You have to accept a much broader definition of “news”, but in return, you get the collective intelligence of the entire community. Very democratic, and as it turns out, very compelling. (Note: there have been rumors for months that Yahoo! will buy Digg, but still no deal)

Small companies can utilize in lots of ways. For example, they can grow traffic (new and repeat site visits) by incorporating community elements into their sites (blogs, open product/service reviews and ratings, content tagging, user generated content, user profiling/social networking, etc.). They can also tap into the larger Web 2.0 economy by providing enabling technologies and services to other companies. Lots of startups, for example, are attempting to make businesses out of providing content/tools for users of popular social networking and other Web 2.0 sites, such as MySpace and Facebook. It all depends on the business, of course. To start, I would suggest that you ask yourself, “how could my business be used to attract communication and participation from users, and do I have the gutts to let them?

Some good slides which i got my hands on.

Tx- Rahul

Business via Social networking?

January 4, 2008 - One Response

Emarket in Second life

It has been said that economic activity takes place within social relations. People create economic gains by what they buy and recommend and how many others with whom they share their preferences. For businesses to reach buyers they need to reach people.

Will social networks be used to facilitate economic transactions B2B, P2P and B2C?

1. Is there an opportunity?
A resounding yes. However, it will have to develop carefully or a social network could quickly degrade to a spam-fest for Viagra and associated “devices.” It will also have to develop so that those whose desire is primarily social will not get turned off by the commercial aspects.

2. How does it differ from traditional Web-based?

Firstly, a Web-based site uses “pull” marketing. That is, I have to know about a site in order to access it–through a search engine hit, link from another site, or some type of referral (individual or advertisement). In contrast, the social network is much more of a “push” marketing environment. That is, even though I am not necessarily looking for something, I am exposed to your’s and others’ talents, skills, and abilities through reading group exchanges and follow-up looking at profiles. Therefore, when there is a need, I have a base that I can draw from. This works much the same as repetitive advertising on TV–it creates top-of-mind recall. For example, I don’t know Vincent from Jack, yet through his numerous responses, I know that he is well-connected and would be a go-to guy if I was looking for a specific skill. I am also confident that I would find what I need much faster than searching on the Web.

This brings up the second major difference from my perspective: Trust. The only thing I have to go on with a traditional Web-based site is 1) does it look professional; 2) does it have any “trust” seals (BBB, eTrust, etc.); and 3) do I know anyone that has had a good or bad experience with the site. In contrast, a social network creates 1) a conversation with the individual (especially if they actively interact in a group); 2) a background through profiles; and 3) a social interaction that enables one to get to know the other individual (warm fuzzy, if you will). In the case of LinkedIn, it also provides testimonials in the form of recommendations which can also increase the comfort level. The point is, all business comes down to developing relationships and a social network is much better at that than a passive Web site.

3. With eCommerce engine, would businesses use it?
Again, I think the answer is yes. However, my guess is it will have a greater success in “service” exchange than in “product” exchange. That is, if I am looking for “some thing,” I will probably go to a traditional Web search that will lead me to a traditional Web site with a catalog of products. But if I am looking for “some one” with specific skills and abilities, I would be more likely to go to a social network site such as LinkedIn because it would be easier to find someone there.

These are my thoughts anyway. I am looking forward to seeing the results.

Rahul

How to Join Forbes Groups on Linkedin?

January 3, 2008 - Leave a Response

I had a friend write to me asking how to join the Forbes.com Entrepreneurs LinkedIn Group (of which I’m a member). So, being the helpful guy I am, I went to go look it up to send it to him. Imagine my surprise when I couldn’t find it!It seemed to me like it should be accessible from the little badge you see on people’s profiles:

forbes_entrepreneurs_badge.gif

But it’s not.

If you’re a member of the group, the image isn’t clickable, and if you’re not a member, it takes you to whatever is configured as the group’s “home page”, which in many cases, including this one, is the company’s web site, not the page for the group. And whether you’re a member or not, the text link generates a search of members of the group — again, not the group home page.

OK, I thought, I’ll check the Group Directory. Well, that’s a bit of a challenge to find in and of itself. Tucked away in the bottom right corner of every LinkedIn page, under the Company Info section, you’ll find a link to LinkedIn for Groups (right).

Once there, there’s a more obvious link to the Group Directory. Unfortunately, that name is a little misleading. See, it’s not actually a directory of all the groups — it’s highlights of just a few of the groups that LinkedIn wants to showcase. Oddly, Forbes.com Entrepreneurs is nowhere to be found in that list.

So, I turned to Google and searched for “forbes.com entrepreneurs” “linkedin group”. Amazingly, there were only a handful of results, not counting all the LinkedIn profiles of people who are members. In fact, only one actually had the link — no surprise, from my good friend Vincent Wright!

Have I built up enough anticipation? Are you dying for the link? Guess what… you could’ve just clicked on the image at the top of the post!

But in case you made it this far and are still wanting the link, here it is, along with links to a couple of other Forbes.com groups (hat tip again to Vincent):

If anybody at LinkedIn is reading this… really, this should be easier, shouldn’t it???

O2 wins UK iPhone deal

October 4, 2007 - Leave a Response

The iPhone will be sold through stores owned by O2, Apple and phone retailer Carphone Warehouse at a price of £269 (US$536).

Apple is expected to announce similar deals with T-Mobile in Germany and Orange in France later this week.
At what cost?

Today’s announcement had been widely anticipated, but many critics say O2 has struck a deal on terms that will cripple its business case.

A report in the Guardian, a British newspaper, says O2 may have agreed to give Apple as much as 40 percent of any revenue it makes from customers’ use of the iPhone

In addition, the operator will have to share some revenues with its retailer Carphone Warehouse, which is understood to have been ushered in after O2 expressed concern about its own limited retail presence in the UK.

Nor will the iPhone do anything for O2’s 3G business. It works with GPRS and EDGE cellular technology only, although it does include a WiFi chipset that allows customers to use any of the 7,500 WiFi hotspots operated by The Cloud for no extra charge. A basic flat-rate tariff that includes unlimited web browsing is to cost £35 (US$70) per month.

Jobs blamed the short battery life that comes with 3G for his current aversion to the high-speed technology.

While O2 is investing in EDGE – a so-called 2.5G standard – CEO Matthew Key says it will extend to just over 30 percent of the UK when the iPhone goes on sale.
New rivals

Consumers’ enthusiasm for the iPhone may have been dampened by the recent launch of the iPod Touch, a new-look version of Apple’s iPod that offers customers the same touch- screen functionality as the iPhone and many similar features.

“The iPod Touch will have come as a shock to the network operators that have secured exclusive rights to sell the iPhone in Europe,” says analyst firm CCS Insight in a research note. “They now face the prospect of having a product that is considerably less attractive than it was when deals for the iPhone were signed with Apple.”

UK operator Vodafone, which is believed to have previously been courted by Apple over an iPhone deal, has been doing its bit to quash interest in the iPhone by publicising its new range of 3G handsets.

Available from a range of suppliers, including Nokia, Samsung and Sony Ericsson, these will operate with HSDPA, a high- speed version of 3G that Vodafone has recently upgraded to perform at a theoretical speed of 7.2Mbps – well in excess of the cellular rates iPhone users will enjoy.

“Fatter years lie ahead for Vodafone’s 3G business,” says Dresdner Kleinwort bank in a research note. “A confluence of better and cheaper devices, good network coverage, faster download speeds and cheaper prices have led to an acceleration of mobile data usage. It’s still early days but we are optimistic that recent momentum is set to continue.”

MIKE WENDLAND’S TECHCAST: Verizon hopes Voyager is iPhone killer
Verizon hopes Voyager is iPhone killer

Why Philippines over India?

September 19, 2007 - Leave a Response

Outsource to the philippinesAmerica Online, Citibank, NEC Telecom, Caltex, Fujitsu, Alitalia – the Philippines’ roster of outsourcing clients stretches from Japan to North America to Europe, and the scope of services that the country’s BPO firms deliver is equally extensive.For years, the contact center sector has led the rapid growth of the country’s offshoring industry. In fact, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) projects its growth to double to 80,000 seats in 2005 from 40,000 seats in the previous year. Recent years, however, have seen both established brands and dynamic startups in the BPO, Software, Animation/Creative, Healthcare, Financial, and Engineering sectors catching up with the pace of the contact center industry, posting dramatic increases in growth indicators.

India is currently the top supplier of BPO services, but the Philippines is close behind. With its strategic business location, steady supply of competent workers, world-class telecom infrastructure, and investor-friendly government incentives, among other advantages, analysts say the Philippines could well be India’s leading challenger.

Powered by ScribeFire.